Raw ACV for heartburn and reflux





"ewwww! go cough it up!"
"mama, he's doing it in my ear again!"
"i can't stand that noise!"
"that sounds disgusting, go blow your nose or something!"

you could hear at least one of these exclamations in our house no less than 5-10 times on any given evening over the last year. all directed at our middle child, now 7. he didn't have any food allergies that we knew of, and so got minimal amounts of all the allergens outside our home and in some lunches. somehow, without our noticing exactly when, he developed this sound in the back of his throat that can only be described as ...*bubbly*. it made my hair stand on end when he'd sit at the dinner table and give a little cough and we'd hear that junk rattling away in there. out in public, other parents would nudge their children away from him, faces frozen politely as he horked up his tuberculosis-sounding esophageal load.

at first we thought it was leftover post-nasal drip from a cold or bug at the end of last summer. everyone got over it and still jonah rattled. fall passed with it unabated and winter came and was the healthiest ever for our family - and still, jonah crackled and bubbled. we made up our minds he was just a juicy kind of kid, maybe he had constant post-nasal drip or something. it didn't seem to affect his breathing. he didn't snore, he could run and play tirelessly and we soon taught him to go cough it up, which made him sound better for an hour or two sometimes.

his teacher finally asked me about it and told me he sounded truly awful. one night when we told him to go cough it up, he vomited. another day the school called to send him home at lunch because he said he vomited after eating. when he got home, he acted completely normal, energetic and healthy. i wondered vaguely if the post-nasal drip was making him nauseous. already only on dairy minimally, i cut it 90% out of his diet, knowing that less dairy should = less mucous.

we took him to an ENT, who suggested that taking out his adenoids could help. we weren't interested in something so drastic without seeing 100% causation and a promise of a 100% cure.
always prone to nosebleeds, they became much more frequent recently so we took him back to the ENT to reevaluate the possibility of cauterizing the errant bundle of capillaries in his nose that caused the bloody gushers. jonah sat there in the exam chair, rattling and bubbling away in the back of his throat, making me cringe. the ENT brought up the adenoidectomy again. i set a date for the surgery, thinking i was ready to try anything to clear that awful sound away.

after i left his office, i started thinking about how long it had been going on and how it was starting to seem like it involves his stomach and i began to slowly form the thought that this might be reflux and not something from the throat or sinuses at all. i mentioned my concerns to our pediatrician at our next visit and he examined jonah and proclaimed confidently, "it's not sinuses or adenoids, it's reflux. he's not a mouth breather, he doesn't snore and the symptoms are worse around meals. he needs to get off dairy 100%, eat smaller, frequent meals and get on an anti-reflux med."

as usual, i balked at medicating a child without first looking to diet or natural remedies. i asked our pediatrician if there was any truth to the folk remedy i've heard about from dozens of pregnant women for heartburn: neutralizing stomach acid with raw apple cider vinegar. he lit up like christmas and said he was so glad i'd brought it up, because he knew for a fact it could work wonders.

i cancelled the surgery and started giving jonah a mixture of 1 part Bragg's raw apple cider vinegar to 1 part water daily. i put 2 tablespoons in a medical shot glass w/ a little dollop of honey waiting like a reward in the bottom. at 1st he took his "shot" of it before every meal, at any sign of bubbliness and any time his stomach hurt. his teacher was awesome about agreeing to dose him in school whenever she heard him sounding phlegmy or he complained of a stomachache and i packed a tiny bottle of it into his lunch, for him to swig before he ate.

the 1st week, he was probably taking 8-10 doses per day. he didn't love it, but we were all amazed that it cleared the horrible wet cough-y sound up instantly. it also cured stomach aches around meals w/in 15 minutes. even his teacher was impressed. by week 2, he was only getting doses at each meal and bedtime - 4 doses a day. this is the 3rd week and he is down to 2 doses: 1 in the morning before breakfast and the one he gives himself at lunch.

of course i finally got around to wondering *what* was causing my 7 year old to suddenly be producing excess amounts of stomach acid and refluxing it into his esophagus - and knowing my family history - i thought, "allergies". sure enough, when we did the skin scratch test, he came back severely allergic to seasonal allergens (like his father) and moderately allergic to two foods ( like two of his siblings):
peanuts and soy. our home is completely free of any trace of peanuts and lucky for us, his school is also peanut restricted. triple lucky for us, because 3 of our children are now allergic to peanuts (one to a life-threatening degree) and next fall, all three of them will be attending the same elementary school. i know all too well that peanut allergy can be unpredictable and even a person with mild or moderate allergy can suffer an anaphylactic reaction out of the blue, so i'm very relieved, proud and grateful that they can attend a peanut-restricted school while they learn how to navigate their food allergies out in the world, away from the safe cocoon of home.

jonah has now begun taking allergy injections for his allergies and gets special hernia-type adjustments from the chiropractor to further help with his formerly severe reflux, but today you would never suspect he has it -and he never had to go onto the scary and dubiously effective anti-reflux meds. i will take a shot of it myself now when i eat things that normally cause heartburn - and it still amazes me when it actually works and prevents the familiar belchy fire!

i know ENTs have to earn a living in this economy, too - and i love our guy beyond all reason, but the feeling of NOT having to do surgery or put my son on a medication with truly scary side effects for an indefinite period of time is wonderful. the cost, the inconvenience and the worry simply can't compare with buying a $10 gallon of this stuff. it's empowering and reaffirming to be able to make some dietary adjustments, add a natural remedy like ACV, and watch your wilting child unfold into the full bloom of health again. somehow it puts the power back where it belongs and doesn't make the parent rely on dr.s and pharmacies and hope someone else did something right to make your child better... and didn't screw up and do something that might make them worse! any time i can avoid them being dependent on a medication, i consider it a victory.

one for the intactivists!


out of the mouths of babes:
i have a whole son still exploring the limits of retractibility.
this morning in his shower he got his biggest peek
at his properly internalized organ.
in utter awe and slight horror, he exclaimed
in whispered excitement,
"oh my GAWD, did i just see my BRAIN?!"

breastfeeding explanation!

all breastfeeding mothers and professionals alike know instinctively that kneading, squeezing, pinching, pushing, jostling, etc... on the breast by a nursing baby or child is to elicit stronger or more frequent letdowns. all you have to do is watch kittens or other mammals nursing - or milk a cow or goat by hand! - to figure out how it works.
but lest any doubt remain, i present you w/ a video of testimony straight from a nursing child himself - "it makes it go "whick! whick! whick!" :-)

before and after shea butter





the last picture was taken 20 minutes after the 1st two! vaseline makes all the creases of his skin bleed, aquaphor just coats and suffocates his skin, any other commercially sold lotions, oils or creams make him sting and itch from the corn-based alcohols and fragrances. prescription steroid creams burn like fire. at this point, when his creases are swollen and seeping blood because his skin has gotten so thin and irritated, even coconut and olive oils provide no real relief, they are too thin.

only waxy, heavily oily, emollient rich raw shea butter truly soothes, nourishes, heals and feeds his skin when he's dried out and fragile after a flare-up like this. i watch the redness literally fade away before my eyes and the inflammation dissipate as it sinks in and his skin drinks it up like the desert does the rain.
thanks be for shea butter for atopic allergies!!

hair today, a jumbled mess tomorrow !







i can't believe the ratio of hair accessories : girl children in this house.
or better yet, the ratio of hair accessories : actual girl child *hair* in this house.
she's got enough accessories for a small nation of girls and only enough hair for one very small dog. and a patchy one, at that.

but hair things and dreaming of the day that she will have long princess hair like her kindergarten classmates makes her happy. and finally being able to buy pink frilly things for one child out of 5 makes *me* happy, so i buy them. and they end up taking up a much coveted drawer - or 2 or 3. you know the ones - they are such a jumbled, tangled mess everyone dreads opening them to look for an elastic hair band or barrette. i tie my hair up in a knot and stick a pencil in it rather than dig through that drawer!

i stood contemplating that drawer for the millionth time this morning, yearning for a hair tie, yet frustrated and annoyed at the mess i knew i'd have to dig through. my eyes went from the dreaded vanity drawer to the vanity mirror, where i had draped a frilly lacy scarf i like but never wore. inspiration suddenly struck and a lightbulb clicked my head. in a flash, i saw all the things from the jumbled drawer flying to a neat and orderly position around the vanity and down the scarf.

i could tie big knots all the way down the scarf to section it off.
put the headwraps/elastic headbands over the pointy top of the vanity frame.
keep the knotted scarf where it is, clip a bunch of the clippy barrettes to the section above the 1st knot.
push the scrunchy-style hair ties above the second knot.
put the gumball style, old fashioned rubber band/ hair ties above the next knot - just wrap them loosely enough to hang above the knot and stay there.
more barrettes below those! the fabric of the scarf (less than $15 from target) would allow for me to clip any style of barrette onto it.
even better, the ends of it have sort of frayed/stray pieces of cloth - perfect for those super teeny tiny, eensy weensy barrettes for baby fine hair.

the plastic/hard head bands could finally have a home on the vanity top itself, once i freed them from the tangle of the drawer. i've tried everything else with them - hanging them on hangers, stacking them around a paper-towel dispenser, i finally realized there's just no good way to store them except for very small piles on a flat surface.

i'm very pleased with the end result! we can see everything now! i finally matched up missing pieces we haven't been able to find in months. i was able to throw away broken and ruined items. i put all the elastic and rubber bands into a mesh wire box by themselves on the vanity top - no more tangling everything up!

i imagine if you don't have a vanity, you could still hang a scarf on a wall and do this. or even a row of 3 or 4 scarves if you have enough hair stuff to organize. it could be done over a dresser top, on a closet wall...etc... if i didn't have a pointy vanity top for all the soft headwraps, i'd hang one of those decorative coathooks for them and then put the scarf under it.

now that cursed vanity drawer is free for all of her her epi-pen purses to go into.
jovie is thrilled with the project - i'm happy to report that is highly 6 year old girl approved! she raved and crowed to see old treasures found and prominently displayed. she thinks it looks like rapunzel's hair, hanging down and all done up with hair accessories! :-)
next i want to get a tussock-style stool to scoot up to the vanity so she can sit and decide what she's going to wear in her hair.

i'm also thinking about a shelf she has in her "someday" room. (the room she will have to herself someday). it is filled with her purses right now, but it could easily hold 4 or 5 scarves for organizing hair accessories. the shelf could hold the hard head bands.

here's hoping this new organization lasts and her 4 brothers don't think the rubberband basket is a handy arsenal for a rubberband war!

"twinkies are healthy for starving people."




i ran across a blog recently that purported to explain why there really is no such thing as "healthy food". the author went on to describe the contradictions and confusion that all of us feel when learning about so many different diets and philosophies about eating today. paleo, south beach, atkins, blood type-based, acidity-based, no-carb, low-carb, fat-free, organic, low-fat, full-fat, vegan, and so on and so forth. i was nodding along for a minute there until she summed it up by basically saying that people should just eat whatever they want - and feed their kids whatever the kids want to eat - because in the end there are no guarantees that eating healthy can actually keep you healthy.

she made a statement in there that basically said that even a twinkie is healthy for a starving person. i tried to shrug it off and understand that she might be confusing "minimally life- sustaining" with "healthy" (you know, like the difference between formula and human milk) and just walk away.

frankly, dealing w/ my own hyperallergic child's current health crisis is taking almost all my free time, so i really had no business looking at a blog that isn't related to my 2 narrow focuses in life right now - learning about safer, non GMO amd cleaner ways to eat and breastfeeding issues. i should really just stick to online materials about those 2 subjects - every time i stray into mainstream info and see what people really think about food, i am astounded. and not in a good way.

but the statement about the twinkies just stuck in my craw. could anyone really EVER think a twinkie was "healthy" ~ under any circumstances? i noticed in the author's bio, that she said she was a "healthy-eating" mother. when i browsed her site a bit more, i found references to "boxed mac and cheese", "drive thru meals" and "cookies". and i remembered the kind of "healthy" feeding i used to do for my 1st children myself. mcdonald's was okay because my kids weren't fat. we went twice a week on gymnastics nights. i knew vaguely that people said it was horrible, but my personal philospohy of "unhealthy food" was if it made you fat. i was uneasily and a bit guiltily willing to accept that french fries were a vegetable and hey - ketchup surely was - it was like, all tomatoes, right?

i watched the comments and replies applauding this open-minded and guilt-assuaging blog article multiply. mothers thanked her for permission to feed their kids what they truly wanted to eat. mothers pointed out that if their children were *such* picky eaters and had so many other issues that ALL they would eat was chicken mcnuggets morning, noon and night - then by god, chicken mcnuggtes are healthy for that child! it went on and on.

i tried to ignore it, reminding myself that there are also blogs where people say that elvis is still alive, too. and that the holocaust never happened. denial can be the best friend of many a harried mother and i lived right on those banks myself until my house tumbled splash into the river and it became a watch -your -family- sink- or -swim situation.

i went on about my schedule but at random times little snippets from the blog article & comments would pop into my head: "yes, i'm a fat woman, but..." "a growth-delayed, sensory-averse child..." "...mother to an underweight, extremely picky eater..." "...the best food for a person stranded on a desert island is hot dogs..." "...not only am i severely underweight...i also have GI issues..." i could go on and on. it's like an actual list of the symptoms of food allergies and intolerances and all the accompanying long-term health issues that result therein, all wrapped up in a justification for continuing to eat fast food, junk food, ramen noodles and mcdonald's!

"whatever's easy with all this stress and illness" are the only comments allowed through the moderation process. trust me, i tried. i know i must be like a dry drunk who thinks everyone that goes near alcohol has to be an alcoholic after all this time with my own food-damaged son, but seriously - reading this article and comments was like watching a drowning person demand a glass of water.

if twinkies are really the answer for starving people, shouldn't the red cross get with it and start shipping them over to 3rd world countries asap? i do concede that they might be ideal in that the expiration date is 'never' and even bugs wouldn't contaminate them. but... seriously?! twinkies for a starving person?? haven't any of these people heard of "supersize me" ?? can you imagine what it would do to a starved, depleted body to consume twinkies? they are hardly more than flavored plastic injected w/ sugar and chemicals! i can't imagine organ failure wouldn't set in within a week or 2 of trying to survive on a diet of twinkies - or hot dogs, for that matter.

and if mcdonald's is "healthy" for a sick, underweight person "who can't/won't eat anything else", then by the same logic, meth would be healthy for all the newborns born meth-addicted, right?

the irony here is that our society *is* starving to death on a diet of limitless twinkies. our bodies are so hungry for true nourishment, that people gorge themselves on whatever tastes good - mistaking overloading your tastebuds with more and more artificial flavor and your body with more and more bad fats, chemicals and genetically modified ingredients with eating something truly nourishing.

as people try harder and harder to sate that hunger, they are growing more and more depleted in vitamins, nutrients & energy while their bodies grow obese trying to store all the excess fat, salt and sugar. and we are only just beginning to get a hint of what the genetically modified ingredients are doing to us!

if people today would only take a few minutes to research what they are actually eating - and what effect it is actually having on their bodies - i have faith that no parent would continue to steadily feed their children the Standard American Diet (SAD). nobody wants to put forth the effort because modern food industries and today's mentality of immediate gratification and convenience assure that people are not likely to take the time to learn about and prepare wholesome, healing and nourishing meals from home. and so the justification and defensiveness about what we eat and feed our kids continues.

i know, i know, i should just stick to the breastfeeding and food allergy blogs out there - trust me, i won't be straying into the scary, Standard American Diet-loving forest of blogs out there again! i have a feeling i'll be seeing some of them again on other food allergy and clean-eating blogs when they finally figure out that their beloved "healthy" fast food is the reason for all their and their children's illnesses, though.

and in the spirit of *not* censoring out the comments that don't agree with a blogger, here's another comment on the article that was not published. the woman who wrote the following also spends her time trying to help people learn how to heal themselves and their children from the ill effects of today's frankenfood.

i may not know exactly which diet philosophy is better than any others - i actually suspect that different body types need different things at different times and no one-size-fits-all way of eating can work for everyone - but i DO know that eating convenient, artificial, chemical-laden and genetically modified foods isn't healthy for ANYONE.

jennifer tow is a good friend, mentor, breastfeeding expert and globally-renowned holistic practitioner on the interweb:

The problem with reading or posting anything on the internet is that you never have the backstory. I tend to ask a zillion questions whenever presented with a situation, which might just be a product of my work as a lactation consultant. So, I have no idea what you eat Arwyn and will not make assumptions. Nor do I need to know, because I can simply address the issue as you presented it.

You say there is no food that brings perfect health. Actually, you can never prove a negative, so I don't know if this is true or not and it doesn't matter. I do know this--that I have worked with tens of thousand of moms and babies over the past 20 years and every single issue that I have ever seen has gotten worse and worse in presentation during that time. Aside from cultural, marketing, economic and social issues that we all know impact birth and infant feeding, the single most significant issue that impacts families is poor nutrition. Or maybe, based upon this post, defense of poor nutrition.

Of course our perception of what is "good" or "bad" will surely have a context. For example, if someone has an allergy to brazil nuts, all the selenium content in the world does not make that a good food for that person. And, if your mother made you finish your least favorite dish as child, after it was cold and everyone else had left the table, I don't care how nutritious it might me, your emotional connection to it might make it toxic to you. After Fukishima, folks in Europe were told not to eat broad leaf greens because they collected too much contaminated rainwater. I get all of that and I agree. Food and its "goodness or badness" have context.

But, it is using these kinds of legitimate points to make such ridiculous rationalizations that really confounds me. And, sure people will get right behind you, because no one wants to do anything that is hard. They would rather believe it doesn't matter. Or at least not very much. I don't care if you are starving--a Twinkie is not healthy--it might sustain you, but it is not ever going to support health. Nor are the vast majority of non-foods people eat every day. As Mark Hyman put it "There is no such thing as junk food. There is food and there is junk."

I spend the majority of my practice helping desperate mothers undo the damage to their babies and children cause by our synthetic/GMO/processed/pasteurized/toxic food supply coupled with our toxic environment and our genetic imprinting from the damage done to our own ancestors by several generations of artificial feeding, medicalized birth, abx and other meds and vaccines. It isn't fun for them and it gets harder all the time and every parent who does not make changes--drastic changes--is adding exponentially to the problem.

We are currently birthing the first generation of children who will not outlive their parents and we are likely the most over-fed, under-nourished people to have every walked the Earth. And we have the wounds and scars to prove it. But, we would rather hide out and defend our addictions, even while those addictions make us sick physically and emotionally, while they fry our children's nervous systems and lead us to medicate them.

You can look at the battles that rage between the Paleo, vegan, raw food, etc camps as more support for your argument, but what I look at are the similarities, because I have no financial interest in any of them. The commonalities are real food. No room for fake food. None. Zero. Some might sprout grains and others say no grains. Some say raw dairy, others none. In the end, it depends on how much gut healing you need to do as to which works best for you, but they all use food that is not GMO or factory-farmed or packaged or processed to death (ours). Look at the similarities and you really can't go wrong. Once you start to feel your own body's true signals again, you can tweak it from there.

What absolutely works for no one though is the crap that the majority of Americans are addicted to, feed their kids and justify through absurd rationalizations, as you have in this post and others have in their comments. If your child only eats mac and cheese or chicken nuggets, then you have two options--rationalize that as good enough or bite the bullet, face your own addictions and get your child and yourself on a gut healing diet, so all of that pickiness disappears with the toxic gut flora and yeast that the fake food is feeding.

Do you have to be a perfectionist? I don't know. Do you want this planet to survive? When we make a mess this big, as we have, then yes, I think we need to be as impeccable as we can to fix it. Do we have to obsess about food. No, we just need to pay attention, become educated and leave the world of non-food behind. Of course, for most people, that's most of what they eat. So, maybe it feels obsessive.

I would say I don't really care what other people feed their kids, and frankly, I don't have much time to think about it if they aren't my clients, but we have come to a point where this human village is at too much risk--frankly, I do not trust sick people to govern this world. And that is where we are rapidly headed.

banned from facebook





so here i am, in exile from facebook yet again - banned due to the breastfeeding picture above in back and white - the one where my newborn 5th child was just about to nurse for the 1st time after his breech home birth. that one has gotten me a 7 day time out - my longest banishment so far! the other pictures are previous ones i've been blocked from using my account for- as they were deemed 'obscene'.

i'm really confused about what exactly is obscene about the 2 with only my son. you can't see a bit of his genitalia or even bare bum. it did used to specify that nipple or areola was considered a violation of fb standards - did that include baby nipples and areola? because i guess you can see his baby moobs in both of those pics... i'm also confused about the banishment itself. i can't post or comment on my own page...but i can post new threads/topics in most of the groups i am in. i just can't comment. and i can still accept friend requests but i can't post links anywhere. if you really want to ban someone and censor them, why let them continue to post in their groups - a place they are most likely to garner support and rally activism against the unfair punishment? none of this makes much sense to me.

it's also worth mentioning that the naked pics of my son came from my "allergy" album and were mainly intended to show the condition of his atopic allergic reactions. both were pictures of him cleared up and doing well. they weren't meant to be "provocative". my fb page is mainly a place of sharing info amongst likeminded ppl on natural parenting and food allergy issues. anyone who spent any time on my fb account knows that these pictures were a joyous celebration of some of the rare times my son is out of pain and discomfort and has beautiful intact skin. to think that anyone could have found this "obscene" and could be looking at these innocent pictures with dirty thoughts in their mind only makes me question what kind of issues they might have, not think there is anything wrong with the pictures.

least of all this rabid and persistent persecution of babies and children feeding normally.

i know the founder of fb is a young guy. raised in america, where we prefer our breasts plumped up into gravity defying, silicon injected, physically preposterous standards for the titillation of adults only - and of course the sale of alcohol, body lotions and victoria's secret undergarments. babies hanging off of them kind of ruins the hugh hefneresque fantasy, i guess.

but when a large group of women show that they want to opt out of this american breasts-as-sexual-objects-only ideal and use them for their intended purpose - why not just go on about your business and let them?

i was young once, too - and raised in america. and oh yeah, had a couple of the dazzling funbags of my own that seemed to set the tone for how i was going to be treated (& expected to act - which is to say IQ need not exceed bra size!) for the majority of my interactions with people - especially men.

i used to work in a couture shoe boutique in an upscale mall. we had a gorgeous ladies lounge. chaise lounges, fine art, giant mirrors so we could pop in and make sure our balconet bralettes were doing their jobs. i remember the first time i saw a nursing mother in there. i had no idea what she was doing. i thought she was just snuggling her baby. then i saw bare breast and a baby attached to it. i'd never seen a woman breastfeed before that i recall, ever.

i was completely embarrassed and uncomfortable. i looked away too quickly and then felt badly that i'd done so and might make the mother feel badly so i tried to look back at her and give a weak smile, but my eyes went straight to that little bundle hooked to her breast and then i was too embarrassed to look at her face again...it was confusing and awkward! i didn't want her to feel badly for feeding her baby, but i thought it was something very private and i surely shouldn't have been looking with my prying eyes, but i couldn't help it because i'd never seen it before...and why did she look *happy*, anyway? didn't it hurt? wasn't it heinously uncomfortable, at the least? wasn't she totally embarrassed that she didn't have a cute bottle for that baby?

fast forward 15 years and i'm the one in the lounge watching the totally embarrassed sales girls hurry out, darting furtive glances at me. and then there were the times i tried to nurse in public and my husband would literally stand beside me, holding a baby receiving blanket up like a matador fighting a bull. i literally shudder to remember the lactational faux pas i have been complicit in! so in a way, i can kind of understand that fb is just a young company with a young owner who doesn't get it.

but even the most socially challenged person can see that the smut that *is* allowed all over fb is a direct slap in the face to those of us who keep getting banned for our breastfeeding pictures. i'm not the only one who feels this is the biggest outrage in the whole farce of 'community standards' and 'obscenity policies'. Emma Kwasnica, Breastfeeding Mom, Says Facebook Yanked 'Sexually Explicit' Pictures. if i'm allowed by the state and most of the country i live in to nurse my baby wherever i am allowed to be...and if those same laws say that if i expose my breast - even nipple and/or areola - while breastfeeding, it is *not* considered public indecency, then who is fb to say otherwise? what is this need to regulate rules about breasts and breastfeeding that are even more restrictive than the "real" laws? fb certainly doesn't do this with breasts in other types of pictures ~ especially sexy or sleazy ones! in fact, the majority of the breastfeeding pictures that have been deleted from facebook do NOT show nipple or areola! Photos of breastfeeding banned by Facebook, Page 1.

not to mention how far they will go to go after *anything* to do with breastfeeding, apparently.Facebook apologises for deleting photos of girls pretending to breastfeed | Life and style | The Guardian. the questions i can't get answered in the endless loop of vague and contradictory fb 'standards' are: what on earth makes a person *this* intent on eradicating all breastfeeding images? did something happen to traumatize the founder and CEO of fb? was he perhaps squirted by a lactating breast when passing by a nursing mother some time? could he have been assaulted and/or traumatized by a leaky mam somewhere along the line? where does this desire to eradicate all breastfeeding imagery come from in a young man who claims he values openness and the ability to facilitate sharing of information above all else? and what does his mother have to say about it? i'd *really* like to hear from her, she's a psychiatrist! or is it as simple as the usual problem in this country - that the formula industry is paying big bucks to have *their* product placement take precedence on fb via the ads? (i really wouldn't know as i delete them all as 'offensive' when they pop up on my page! :-P)

i try to take a zen approach to it when it happens to me now - which it does with regularity. i'm not sure if fb keeps rechecking the albums of past offenders, or searches through the friends of someone who currently got flagged (because it does usually seem that a whole group of us go down together), but it's to the point now that anytime i get the login prompt when i know i didn't log off, i steel myself for the warning and then violation notice. one time i got them but it never went into effect, but only one time. at first it made me furious. i mean livid. how dare someone call my feeding of my child obscene? or pictures of my child that do NOT show any genitalia or even buttocks, a violation of decency standards? the activist in me was seething with a need to clarify, rectify, terrify! someone for this. but there's nowhere to complain, nobody to question - no phone numbers, no email, no responses, nothing but a loop of endless links that don't really answer my questions at all. it's obvious someone isn't even really looking at the pictures they're punishing me for, because two of these don't even meet their standards for obscenity in any way.

so now i tell myself to enjoy fb to the fullest while i use it and take it a sign from the universe that i need to take a break when i get banned. its a good lesson to me not to put all my eggs in one basket, too. if it disables my communication with moms i am helping in my lactation counselor capacity, i was relying on it too much! if it hurts my sales for my allergy cookies to not be able to post on that page for a few days, then i probably should have an independent website for them! if it means i won't keep up with close friends during important times or events then i should be calling, emailing or keeping it more personal! i also made a vow to myself to make the temporary ban something that makes up for the time i do spend on fb.

for each day of the ban, i have to do one thing i've been putting off around the house and one special or putty-offy thing w/ the kids each day. today i cleaned and scrubbed under the stove and then got out the mending and sewing before bed and did mending projects w/ the kids and taught the little ones how to sew. tomorrow i will pull out the 'fridge and clean under there and either sew again with the kids before bed (they love it!) or make get well cards with them for my terminally ill mother. this way when i get back on fb, my karma is clean as i feel i 'earned' it..and i have also atoned for the fact in advance that i'm putting those pics right back up! :-P
it also helps to keep me from foaming at the mouth when this happens, to see what great company i am in.

and if that isn't enough to set my attitude back on straight, this is:

~~~~update for friday, january 13, 2012~~~~

well, close your windows in case of flying pigs, but it appears that my friend emma kwasnica is actually making headway with her fight against the lactoferrinous discrimination on fb!

this woman is my hero. as i sit here, being all zen about it - she is (once again!) making online booby history! (85) Emma Kwasnica responds to Facebook after receiving apology. my chest engorges proudly at her persistence. or it might be nursing time for my preschooler. either way, emma would be gleeful!

i can just see her, championing the cause for dejected and persecuted mammaries everywhere. i picture her trotting down a line of female busts, with an encouraging word for all, emanating a unity that not even the widest cleavage could divide. she'd pat a billowing sideswell here, give an uplifting tweak to a downcast nipple there, and then trot off in full battle regalia for the worthy cause of hard working jahoobies everywhere! her cape, of course, would be the patchwork quilt made to honor her work - made up of breastfeeding images from all over the globe.

i might have sparkling appliances, mended laundry and occasionally lower blood pressure by not getting so riled up when i get banned (tho perhaps not, because one of the benefits of breastfeeding *is* those calming hormones!), but this woman has the heart of a warrior inside the body of a nurturer.

the founder of fb is quoted in wikipedia as saying his interests include "revolutions" Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia... well, hold onto your hairy milkless little moobs, mr. CEO of fb, because you let your revolution in by the front door when emma kwasnica signed on to facebook and found your discrimination against a baby's right to be fed normally and a woman's right to do so without being harassed!

thank you for all you do for the breastfeeding cause, emma - i'm proud to call you friend.

a reluctant update







i don't want to blog this update. i've tried every way to avoid it lately. have you ever done that, and then gradually everything in your world points you back to what you're trying to ignore?

instead of blogging about how our food allergy guy is doing lately, i delved into my lactation counseling work, which has come to be about helping nursing dyads also dealing w/ multiple food allergies more and more. i followed up with one mom i'd worked with for almost 9 months and heard that they'd trialed his allergens back into her diet and he was now non-reactive to them - mom could lift the restrictions for both her and her toddler! most of the moms and babies i work with get to this point eventually.

happy as i was for them, i couldn't help but reflect that in over 4 yrs of radical restrictions, my son has never lost or "outgrown" an allergy yet, despite complete avoidance and gut-healing protocols. i think it might be time to blog it out, to finally just put it in writing and face it to deal with it. not only does my son have severe multiple food allergies, but they're not acting like "normal" ones at all. he can't try new things, he becomes allergic to them. they don't become milder over time, they become worse, his sensitivity to them increases and his sensitivity levels on tests gets higher the longer we avoid them.

i feel the normal frustration and confusion set in and push the thought of blogging about it away. putting it into text and white will make it real, allow others to bear witness, make me have to accept it. i don't want to accept it, we are muddling through despite the difficulties, i will write about it when we have a positive change or clear cut answer about his unusual presentation, to share.

i ignore my glaring monitor and beckoning keyboard to run some errands w/ my little guy while my other children are in school. we run into another mom i helped through breastfeeding difficulties recently. she stops me to catch up and her 16 month old toddler is taller than my 4 year old and outweighs him by over 10 pounds now. when i get home, i look through my records and realize that almost every single baby or infant i have worked with has surpassed my son in height and weight by the time they are 18 months - 2 years old.

i tell myself he's always been small and ignore the persistent whisper in my brain that reminds me that we now know he hasn't grown even of a fraction of an inch since last may (7 months now) and has typically not gained more than 2-4 oz per month since reaching toddlerhood - in fact, some months he has lost weight - despite my care to provide and track 1200-1400 calories plus unlimited access to breastmilk day and night. i've been nursing for 12 years straight next month and we know that human milk tends to grow fatter the longer a woman lactates, so i guesstimate he is getting at least another 200-600 calories from human milk on days that he nurses longer. i push down the burgeoning weight of the panic that wants to come when i see much younger toddlers surpassing his growth. i will write a blog entry when he's had a growth spurt, i decide.

we make a trip to pick up my daughter from kindergarten and 'lou builds a lego vehicle and tells a classmate of hers. the boy looks at me and exclaims "your baby can talk?!" we stop at costco on the way home and 'lou asks if he can run up and down on the grassy median next to our vehicle while i load up. i say yes and begin loading up only to hear someone calling out to me. an employee working in the parking lot jogs up and points at 'lou and exclaims,
"your baby, your baby!"
i'm puzzled and tell him,
"he's not a baby, he's 4. he's okay there, he knows not to step into the parking lot."
the man apologizes and explains that he thought i hadn't noticed my baby running off. now i recall & understand an incident inside the store. i'd agreed to let 'lou stand in the toy aisle and browse while i walked 20 feet away to look at bedding and towels. a woman had led him back to me by the hand and said,
"she wandered away!" (everyone thinks he's a girl right now - even when he's *not* playing princess dress-up with his sister!)

it sank in that i see him and normalize his size to match his abilities and development, but other people are perceiving his size to be much younger than his years now. i know a lot of children with food allergies - both in real life and in groups and forums online, but i don't know any who have had the slow growth and now apparent total lack of growth that my son has. i know children who have much much higher overall IgE levels who still grow. children who are anaphylactic and airborne, who still grow. children actually allergic to more things than my son and on more restricted diets, who still grow. children who are even allergic to things like heat and cold and their own sweat, but still, they grow.

i think about sitting down and putting this new issue on my blog - of wrapping my brain around it and trying to grasp it and speculate about it - but everything in me just pushes the thought away.
"i'll give it more time", i think.
"it's probably just temporary, once i can look back on it after having gone through it, i can write about it in a more helpful way, with more answers
for other people who might be in the same boat."

well, it's been 7 months now and it hasn't gone away. my son is stuck at 37" and 28 1/2 pounds at 4 years. in summer clothes w/ short sleeves and pants, he still fits in his 3-6 month infant outfits. in long clothes, he's in 18 months - 2t. i am always surprised when it jumps out at me in pictures with all of my kids together. they are all 15 mos- 22 mos apart with the exception of a 3 yr gap between #'s 2 and 3. but #2 is small and #3 is big, so they all end up looking like stair steps...and then there's 'lou, falling way down in the stair step design, also only 22 mos younger than his closest sib but looking 3 or 4 years younger. with 5 kids, you can sort of plot the genetic curve of your family and see when someone is popping up out of it - or falling down out of it. i remember before the food allergies grew like wildfire, their weights were at 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 pounds exactly. this greatly pleased the OCD side of me. now the other 4 are all still within 10 pounds of each other, but 'lou is 4 and his sister is 5 and he is almost 30 pounds less than her.

i still wasn't ready to blog about all that we're dealing with right now, until i got an email from a reader of my blog. she has a child with similar allergies to mine. she thanked me for blogging about it, she thanked me for speaking from the heart and sharing what has worked and what hasn't... but most of all she thanked me for just putting it out there because she said she'd never found another site that she could relate to. just hearing that she wasn't the only one, her child wasn't the only one, helped her so much. the dr.s don't know how to tell her to feed her child, they can't tell her why he's so allergic or when/if he'll outgrow it. she didn't need me to have all the answers, she didn't need me to fix her problems, she just needed to go somewhere and read that someone else was going through it, too. that someone else was as scared and as frustrated and as lost and determined as her. having a multiple food allergy child is a lot like being lost at sea. this is one diagnosis where the dr.s are possibly learning more from us than we are from them.

she is right, it's so important to share what we are going through - even when we're floundering, because we just might be able to learn from each other and find a better way - and we don't have to use our medical insurance or wait for 9-5 business hours to do so. i know sometimes when i search the other multiple food allergy mom blogs i don't want new recipes, i don't need updates on food allergy organization activities - i want to know what they're dealing with now. i want to know how their journey is going - what twists and turns their path is taking.

so, i'm going to write about where we're at and if i leave it unfinished, well...that's where we're at, too.

'lou is allergic to: corn, dairy, egg, soy, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, seafood, most beans, lentils and sesame as well as dogs and cats and the usual seasonal allergens like trees, molds and grasses. he's never had shellfish yet, but i know if i gave them to him, he'd become allergic. he has become allergic to most prescription medications i (rarely & only when absolutely necessary) take, even when compounded to remove all allergens.

for the last year or so (until very recently), i have been unable to get him to baseline for any consistent amount of time. i still breastfeed him and he and i avoid all of his allergens 100%. instead of just wheat, we are gluten free (everything w/out wheat uses soy or corn as a sub anyway, so it's not even really an option!) and i always err on the side of caution when i'm not sure if something could be making him react. we are also very lucky that the tests are almost always in perfect harmony with what i observe. (ie, if i suspect he is becoming allergic to beans, the test shows i'm right). we are even more lucky that none of his reactions are anaphylactic, like his big sister's peanut allergy is.

he almost always has a setback in summers. when he was younger, it seemed that multiple summer viruses were the trigger. viruses can set off reactions in children like him as if they've eaten a food they are allergic to. this past summer, i just could not get him cleared up. on my personal scale of 1-10 for allergy reactions and overall misery of life (w/ 10 being the worst), he was at a steady 7, sometimes 8. i just could not figure out what he was reacting so strongly to. his worst/most sensitive allergies are to corn, dairy, egg and dog. we had gotten a new dog (2 great danes now) but i've seen with my own eyes that he does not react to these low allergen dogs, so i knew it wasn't that.

eventually, his reactions got so bad that his swiss cheese skin full of open sores began to slough off in patches on his hands and feet and we had to do a round of oral steroids and antihistamines and practically bind him up at night to stop the incessant scratching. one day it hit me like a ton of bricks that even though we knew better than to take *him* near the public dog park (instant hives!), we were taking the new dog almost daily over the summer to help with her socialization. and then bringing the dogs home *in the vehicle 'lou rides in*, covered in the fur, dander, slobber -and sometimes worse!- of dozens of other dogs, potentially hundreds! we'd bring them home to spread one of his worst allergens all over the house!

as soon as i realized this had to be the cause of his misery, we stopped going to the dog park, deep cleaned the house (thanks be for all wood floors, i say this daily!), washed the dogs and waited to see if he improved. he did, rapidly and dramatically. before the dog park excursions, we'd had his overall IgE level tested and it was elevated, but not alarming. normal is around 118, and his was in the 300's, if i recall correctly. after the dog park excursions, we retested him and it was at 3, 776. this was the end of the mysterious allergy setback of summer, 2011.

we have been settling in for fall and winter and getting ready to enjoy 'lou's healthy time of year. this is when his weight gains and growth become consistent and bigger, this is when his skin gets healthier and this is when we can test with food trials to see if he's tolerating his lesser allergens yet (wheat, soy). but this year i'd taken him to a new dr., a holistic MD - during the height of the summer outbreaks, when we hadn't yet figured them out. we got the results of his extensive testing after 'lou was well on the path to recovery and we were as surprised as the dr. to hear the results. 'lou's blood tests had revealed markers and red flags for a rare, autosomal-recessive genetic disorder called Glutaric Acidemia II (GA2) , an inborn error of metabolism. he recommended that we take 'lou to a biochemical geneticist next.

the more i learned about the disorder, the more i noticed symptoms of 'lou's (and maybe even jonah's atypical seizure disorder and jake's atypical sleep disorder!) that could fit for milder forms of the genetic disorder. 'lou cannot ever go for more than 3-4 hours without food or nursing. at 4 yrs old, he still nurses multiple times a day (6ish on most days, more when he's not feeling well) as well as a couple of times through the night. at this age, most self-led weaning children will begin to avoid public nursing, but 'lou does not. he becomes frantic when he hasn't eaten and needs to nurse, saying things like, "i need mookies now, i'm gonna die, i'm gonna barf..." when he's symptomatic he also has mild/moderate exercise intolerance and muscle weakness and throughout his life there have been several times that someone has noted that he has acetone breath, including right after he was born and had nursed for the first couple of times. if it turns out he does have this or another metabolic disorder, i am certainly going to credit long-term breastfeeding with helping to keep metabolic and sugar crises at bay, because no matter where we are, no matter how far from food, i always have calories and nourishment perfect and ready for him.

by the time we got in to see the geneticist, 'lou was at baseline and as healthy as he gets. he was retested for GA II, but it came back normal. the dr. tells us that you have to test when the child is sick for accurate test results, so now we have to wait until he is sick again. which, it's my job to hope he never is again. in the meantime, his examination revealed several mild or benign genetic/birth defects that 'lou has which the geneticist felt could fit another genetic syndrome that includes lack of growth ("short stature" and "failure to thrive" were his official diagnoses of 'lou's size), so we agreed to test for that one, as well.

the test results for Russell-Silver Syndrome also came back negative and we agreed to see an endocrinologist to cover all the bases, until we can retest for GA II, when 'lou is ill.
he also has genetic abnormalities that match the description of Aarskog-Scott syndrome, so we will be testing for that next.

the endocrinologist said there could be 4 causes for lack of growth in a child:
1. severe emotional stress; like death of a parent, divorce, move to a new house, abusive environment, etc... none of which are present in our case.
2. nutritional deficiencies. not applicable in our case - which even the dr. agreed with after seeing all of 'lou's bloodwork for vitamin & mineral levels.
3. excessive steroid use. 'lou's only been on oral steroids 3 times and we don't use any other form, like sinus sprays - this isn't a factor for him.
4.inflammation. excessive inflammation with many autoimmune disorders can cause the patient to stop growing. i've known of many, many cases that were far worse off than my son's, who still grew - but i'm not sure if anyone can say what level of inflammation stops growth for any individual person - so i leave this one as a possible question mark.

what we do know for sure now is that his "short stature" is not what was genetically intended for him, based on the tests the endocrinologist performed. he said that 'lou's results came back indicating that he has the growth hormone levels of a person of average height. given his small size, the dr. expected to see levels for a person of short stature. which means something is interfering w/ the growth hormones actually getting to where they need to go to make 'lou grow to average height for his age. but it's not his thyroid or any other gland or organ that has anything to do with hormones or growth factors; they all tested normal. so this dr. has given 'lou 6 more months (5 at the time of this writing) to grow an inch. if he does not, his recommendation is for daily human growth hormone injections until 'lou is 16 years old.

i wonder what the consequences of forcing a body to grow taller when you can't get it to gain weight consistently could be. i don't want to make my son emaciated and weak by forcing his body to grow if it doesn't think it should expend the energy doing so, on its own. i'm very driven to find out the cause behind this lack of growth before i just start treating the symptoms blindly.

the endocrinologist agrees that we need to follow up with the geneticists and explore and rule out growth and metabolic disorders in the meantime.

we already saw a GI specialist for him when he was younger as well as a dietician/nutritionist. the GI dr. said he most likely has Eosinophilic Esophagitis. other than the poor growth and multiple food allergies, though, i see no symptoms of it whatsoever. so i declined the confirming biopsy because we already do what we'd need to do if he did have it, which is a radical elimination diet and oral steroids when needed. the dietician said his diet is fantastic and she'd like to share my blog with other patients.

we tried S.L.I.T. therapy this year, and the dr. said 'lou was the 1st patient he'd had with such an incredible sensitivity to corn. (we got to 1 part corn, 10 MILLION parts water and he was still having reactions). the dr. had to recommend we discontinue therapy, and said he'd not had a case he couldn't treat before, so he thinks there is something besides normal food allergy going on with 'lou also. even though it didn't work for us, i completely recommend this therapy (and this dr!) and would try it again in a heartbeat if 'lou were eligible. i did a lot of research into it before we attempted it and this local dr. in particular treated us and our unusual case with the utmost care, concern and careful research. i unhesitatingly refer any interested mothers i work with to dr. tulin-silver for this therapy locally.

so we've been muddling through dr. appointment after dr. appointment and blood test after blood test these past few weeks and all the while the actual allergy reactions really seem to be calming down. i would get 'lou to baseline, then he'd flare up and i'd figure out it wasn't a food, but fleece, which i had no idea is a known skin irritant! then it was any microfiber and wool. he hasn't had a reaction i would put above a 3 all of this fall. we've even had a couple of accidental exposures (white beans in some chili and citric acid in some pineapple) and his reaction was fleeting! instead of the 2-4 weeks of rash, sores, sleeplessness and itchy misery even the smallest ingestion of citric acid used to cause, 'lou was only red and itchy for 2 hours last week! the beans barely caused a blip on his allergy radar.

i've also noticed that 'lou is beginning to react to all kinds of synthetic fabrics just from touching them now. when we go to the drs'. offices or stores or pretty much anywhere outside our own home, he is at baseline when we leave and begins to flare up in the new environment.

he gets red and blotchy, sometimes with wide streaks going down from under his eyes to his jaws. he starts scratching and rubbing. even the rash is not in the typical pattern of a food reaction, so i can tell it's from contact. his nose will start running and yet sounds inflamed and stuffy at the same time. if he sits near a smoker or heavy perfume wearer, his eyes will start burning and he will start asking for a wet rag to put on them.

as soon as we leave, it will all start clearing up - literally while we are still in our vehicle, 10-15 minutes later. it is the most amazing thing i've seen. anyone with a child who has only had very long-lasting, very severe atopic reactions will know what i mean when i say that these temporary and transient reactions seem like magic to me.

perhaps the oddest and most instinctively contradictory part of this for me as a mother to an anaphylactic-reactive child AND an atopic one is that 'lou has also occasionally broken out in hives w/ this new pattern of chemical or environmental reactiveness and i have had to consciously remind myself that while hives are an emergency of the most dire kind in my daughter, they are nothing to worry about in my son and will fade away as soon as we get him out of the area where they started!

his allergist has been telling me all along that the general course these hyperallergic children seem to follow is if they are born with food allergies or develop them in infancy, then they tend to start outgrowing them by 2 or 3, whereupon they begin to develop seasonal/environmental allergies/asthma instead. he thinks these recent changes in 'lou's reaction patterns could indicate that 'lou is finally falling into line w/ the typical pattern, although he's doing it a little later than average and the dr. says most children like 'lou already had chemical sensitivities all along and don't develop them this late, at the same time as the seasonal ones. so we decided to test his allergies with a RAST blood test again and i just got the results the other day.

his overall IgE score has dropped from 3, 776 to 1, 180 (again, w/ around 118 being normal). i think this reflects us cutting out the dog park cross-contamination exposures, his allergist thinks it might signal the seasonal allergies abating w/ the colder weather (3,776 was august, 1,1,80 was december). so this was in line with what we expected and hoped for.

his allergy to dog has more than tripled and is now off the charts. it is literally not measureable anymore unless it comes way down and gets back onto the charts. (it went from 42.7 to over 150). this one didn't surprise me when you think there are hundreds of dogs that go to that dog park and my dogs were bringing home traces of them all, all summer. the allergist worries our own dogs are keeping this number so high, but i've seen with my own eyes how he reacts to dogs (hives, instant "sunburn" rash everywhere, itching) and he doesn't react to ours.

his allergy to cat went from 9.75 to 80 which added insult to injury as i rehomed my beloved cat of 15 years over 2 years ago because of his allergy and he has almost no exposure to cats, ever. he maybe goes into a home with cats in it once every 3-6 months, if that.

grass and trees are now really bad, which also lines up with what we expected.

what we didn't expect is what happened with the foods. dairy quadrupled. dairy has gone up as if he or i are consistently eating some form of dairy. he has never in his entire life eaten any form of dairy. he only got exposed to it through me in utero and then for 7 wks postpartum, through my milk. after that, i cut out every trace of it. the only way i can think he is getting exposed now is simple contact from the rest of the family eating it. his skin is as thin and fragile as rice paper, even when he's not reacting to something. it is always tight and dry, more like an elderly person's than a child's.

he is now also showing up as allergic to all the things we eat. bananas, beef, pork, coconut, avocados, garlic, even rice. he's beginning to have reactions to contact with some of these foods, like coconut. combined w/ the foods he's been allergic to all along, this doesn't leave us much to eat! i call this an "allergic crisis" and this is the 3rd time it has happened to him. we may have to put him on steroids, go down to eating only 2-3 or items that are safe for him for a couple of weeks and hope the steroids calm things down. it is interesting to note that he continues to gain weight through the previous 2 - and this - allergic crisis. he is getting harder and harder to keep at baseline, and he is beginning to wake at night with itching and crying, but he has gained 4 oz in 2 weeks, which is excellent for him. testing also showed that his vitamin d and niacin levels are currently optimal (they were low before and we began supplementation).

atopic children have extremely permeable skin and can transmit allergens directly into their bloodstream this way. 3 of his 4 siblings and his father still eat dairy in our home. the only way i can think of to stop these exposures is to ban dairy from our house completely. it puts a whole new perspective on things like the ice cream party my daughter just had in her kindergarten class. even tho i brought her her own rice milk ice cream, 29 other kindergartners sat around her, dripping and oozing dairy onto their faces, hands, chairs and tables. i've now come to view dairy the way other mothers might view, say, ebola smears.

he starts kindergarten next fall. if i think asking our school to go peanut free was fun, what would it be like to ask his classrooms to give up their pizza and ice cream parties? i guess i will just be keeping him home on party days if his levels remain this high.

all of his other food allergies have gone up, as well -although none so drastically as dairy. (those who know me well and recall that my first recommendation toward gut healing for *any* allergy child is to ditch the dairy (a known gut irritant) can perhaps appreciate the irony and my extreme irkability at this test result!)

wheat was almost close to being the first allergy he "outgrew", but it's back on the allergic radar now. corn is up, despite me seeing less severe reactions with accidental exposures.

his allergist is very surprised as we both expected all the foods to be lower as the seasonal went higher. i can't imagine a child this allergic to *everything*. thoughts of the bubble boy movie come to mind. i am holding out every hope right now that the test just hasn't quite caught up with the reality. and that his growth is also on a delayed reaction from the horrible summer and that soon it will rebound and he will have a nice growth spurt and we can be done with the scarier potential diagnoses.

although honestly, there have been times i've thought the shots and supplements and diets and protocols for those disorders would be easier than what we have to do right now - especially if treating the underlying genetic disorder helped to clear up the food allergies.

so that's where we're at, 4 years later and no clear cut answers or real improvement yet. still, i feel like we are on the edge of some kind of change and i am putting all my energy and intentions toward it being for the better. i'd love to hear from anyone with any similar experiences or insights!

and my best new tip is this:

make an album on FB to keep track of your child's (or your!) allergy symptoms. i went back and put in pics of all of 'lou's reactions and rashes, chronologically, right from birth - with a brief description and list of possible triggers/exposures next to them. this has turned into an invaluable tool for me. i scan through the pics in perfect order and pick up on patterns and triggers much more easily than from my food log alone.

for instance, i recently noticed that in every night-crying-and-scratching pic, he was sleeping in our microfleece sheets, but in good sleeping pics, they were cotton sheets! i also noticed which type of rash seemed to go w/ which type of allergen this way. and it has become especially helpful in meeting with new specialists. i email it to them before our appointment and a picture really is worth a thousand words as it saves us both time and effort in trying to keep track of and describe his symptoms. you can copy and paste the public link to allow anyone to view it, even people not on facebook.

and for anyone in michigan or nearby who thinks they might like to utilize the fact that our dr.s and pharmacy have already had to learn about corn and other "extreme" food allergies because of treating 'lou, here's a list of the dr.s i use and highly recommend:

Welcome to Troy Family Practice, PLLC » Troy Family Practice, PLLC ( dr. stacey beltz is a primary care physician who "gets" and works with concerns of a mother breastfeeding a hyperallergic child)
allergy/bahrainwalla (dr. abdul bahrainwala is the most patient and open-minded allergist we've ever met who has learned to think outside the 'prescriptions for symptoms" box for kids like 'lou & truly respect, value & listen to a parent as an expert on their child)
Bio Energy Medical Center 734-995-3200 (dr. james neuenschwander, holistic MD - not sure if i love this guy b/c i told him once i thought another dr. might be avoiding my calls and he laughed his ass off and said, "want me to call him and tell him that's not gonna work with you?" or because he's not just another pretty dr. face but digs deeper and looks for the main cause and not just the symptoms. if we find out 'lou really does have GA II, it will only be because this dr. took the time to look harder then anyone else so far.)
S.L.I.T. (dr. tulin-silver gets all of my referrals for local moms considering allergy shots as well as ones having unresolving food allergy issues akin to 'lou's.)
http://www.richmanrootdelaney.com/ (dr. delaney is a peds dentist whose entire staff consider and accommodate children with concerns like 'lou's.)
Physicians Compounding Pharmacy - full range of compounded medications, including cosmeceuticals, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals. (best compounding pharmacy ever! karen raetz has learned everything about corn terms right along with me, i trust her implicitly not to make a mistake or overlook anything in making our medications and supplements.)